Close
ENT CONFERENCE
Grand Millennium, Muscat, Oman
Follow us:
Organized By
Collaboration With
Conference
Welcome Message
About The Conference
Organizers
Scientific Committee
Guest Society
Program
Conference Agenda
Workshops
Speakers list
Workshop Registration
Conference Registration
Sponsors
Our Sponsors
Previous Sponsors
Sponsor Packages
Become a Sponsor
Book a Stand
Media
Gallery
News
Contact
DELEGATE REGISTRATION
STAND BOOKING
BECOME SPONSOR
Conference Feedback Form
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Name
*
First
Last
Email
*
Phone
*
Day One Sessions
*
Session 1
Session 2
Session 3
Day Two Sessions
*
Session 4
Session 5
Session 6
Content of Session 1
Meeting the objectives
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program met the identified objectives)
Relevant to my educational needs
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The content was relevant to my educational needs)
Program structure and organize
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program was well-structured and organized)
No bias or conflict of interest
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)
Meet your expectations
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Quality of the activity met my expectations)
Outcome of Session 1
Knowledge of the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The understanding of the knowledge)
Competence
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The ability to apply the knowledge)
Performance
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(What is actually done in practice)
Speakers of Session 1
The content was up-to-date and evidence- based
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Audio-visuals were used effectively
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Interactive discussion was stimulated
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Content of Session 2
Meeting the objectives
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program met the identified objectives)
Relevant to my educational needs
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The content was relevant to my educational needs)
Program structure and organize
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program was well-structured and organized)
No bias or conflict of interest
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)
Meet your expectations
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Quality of the activity met my expectations)
Outcome of Session 2
Knowledge of the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The understanding of the knowledge)
Competence
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The ability to apply the knowledge)
Performance
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(What is actually done in practice)
Speakers of Session 2
The content was up-to-date and evidence- based
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Audio-visuals were used effectively
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Interactive discussion was stimulated
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Content of Session 3
Meeting the objectives
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program met the identified objectives)
Relevant to my educational needs
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The content was relevant to my educational needs)
Program structure and organize
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program was well-structured and organized)
No bias or conflict of interest
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)
Meet your expectations
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Quality of the activity met my expectations)
Outcome of Session 3
Knowledge of the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The understanding of the knowledge)
Competence
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The ability to apply the knowledge)
Performance
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(What is actually done in practice)
Speakers of Session 3
The content was up-to-date and evidence- based
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Audio-visuals were used effectively
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Interactive discussion was stimulated
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Day One Comment
Content of Session 4
Meeting the objectives
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program met the identified objectives)
Relevant to my educational needs
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The content was relevant to my educational needs)
Program structure and organize
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program was well-structured and organized)
No bias or conflict of interest
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)
Meet your expectations
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Quality of the activity met my expectations)
Outcome of Session 4
Knowledge of the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The understanding of the knowledge)
Competence
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The ability to apply the knowledge)
Performance
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(What is actually done in practice)
Speakers of Session 4
The content was up-to-date and evidence- based
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Audio-visuals were used effectively
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Interactive discussion was stimulated
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Content of Session 5
Meeting the objectives
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program met the identified objectives)
Relevant to my educational needs
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The content was relevant to my educational needs)
Program structure and organize
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program was well-structured and organized)
No bias or conflict of interest
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)
Meet your expectations
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Quality of the activity met my expectations)
Outcome of Session 5
Knowledge of the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The understanding of the knowledge)
Competence
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The ability to apply the knowledge)
Performance
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(What is actually done in practice)
Speakers of Session 5
The content was up-to-date and evidence- based
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Audio-visuals were used effectively
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Interactive discussion was stimulated
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Content of Session 6
Meeting the objectives
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program met the identified objectives)
Relevant to my educational needs
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The content was relevant to my educational needs)
Program structure and organize
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The program was well-structured and organized)
No bias or conflict of interest
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)
Meet your expectations
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(Quality of the activity met my expectations)
Outcome of Session 6
Knowledge of the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The understanding of the knowledge)
Competence
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(The ability to apply the knowledge)
Performance
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
(What is actually done in practice)
Speakers of Session 6
The content was up-to-date and evidence- based
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Audio-visuals were used effectively
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Interactive discussion was stimulated
*
Rate 1 out of 5
Rate 2 out of 5
Rate 3 out of 5
Rate 4 out of 5
Rate 5 out of 5
Day Two Comment
Submit
1
