Feedback Form – ENT Update

Close

ENT Update

Follow us:

7th – 8th December 2023

Sheraton Hotel

Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

Organized by

Menu

Conference
Program
Sponsors
Media
- Gallery
- News
Recommended hotels
- Conference
- Workshops
Contact

STAND BOOKING

REGISTER TO WORKSHOP

REGISTER TO CONFERENCE

BECOME SPONSOR

Conference Feedback Form

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone *

Day One Sessions *

Session 1
Session 2
Session 3

Day Two Sessions *

Session 4
Session 5
Session 6

Content of Session 1

Meeting the objectives *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program met the identified objectives)

Relevant to my educational needs *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The content was relevant to my educational needs)

Program structure and organize *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program was well-structured and organized)

No bias or conflict of interest *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)

Meet your expectations *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Quality of the activity met my expectations)

Outcome of Session 1

Knowledge of the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The understanding of the knowledge)

Competence *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The ability to apply the knowledge)

Performance *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(What is actually done in practice)

Speakers of Session 1

The content was up-to-date and evidence- based *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Audio-visuals were used effectively *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Interactive discussion was stimulated *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Content of Session 2

Meeting the objectives *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program met the identified objectives)

Relevant to my educational needs *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The content was relevant to my educational needs)

Program structure and organize *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program was well-structured and organized)

No bias or conflict of interest *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)

Meet your expectations *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Quality of the activity met my expectations)

Outcome of Session 2

Knowledge of the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The understanding of the knowledge)

Competence *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The ability to apply the knowledge)

Performance *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(What is actually done in practice)

Speakers of Session 2

The content was up-to-date and evidence- based *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Audio-visuals were used effectively *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Interactive discussion was stimulated *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Content of Session 3

Meeting the objectives *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program met the identified objectives)

Relevant to my educational needs *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The content was relevant to my educational needs)

Program structure and organize *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program was well-structured and organized)

No bias or conflict of interest *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)

Meet your expectations *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Quality of the activity met my expectations)

Outcome of Session 3

Knowledge of the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The understanding of the knowledge)

Competence *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The ability to apply the knowledge)

Performance *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(What is actually done in practice)

Speakers of Session 3

The content was up-to-date and evidence- based *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Audio-visuals were used effectively *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Interactive discussion was stimulated *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Day One Comment

Content of Session 4

Meeting the objectives *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program met the identified objectives)

Relevant to my educational needs *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The content was relevant to my educational needs)

Program structure and organize *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program was well-structured and organized)

No bias or conflict of interest *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)

Meet your expectations *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Quality of the activity met my expectations)

Outcome of Session 4

Knowledge of the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The understanding of the knowledge)

Competence *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The ability to apply the knowledge)

Performance *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(What is actually done in practice)

Speakers of Session 4

The content was up-to-date and evidence- based *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Audio-visuals were used effectively *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Interactive discussion was stimulated *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Content of Session 5

Meeting the objectives *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program met the identified objectives)

Relevant to my educational needs *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The content was relevant to my educational needs)

Program structure and organize *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program was well-structured and organized)

No bias or conflict of interest *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)

Meet your expectations *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Quality of the activity met my expectations)

Outcome of Session 5

Knowledge of the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The understanding of the knowledge)

Competence *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The ability to apply the knowledge)

Performance *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(What is actually done in practice)

Speakers of Session 5

The content was up-to-date and evidence- based *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Audio-visuals were used effectively *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Interactive discussion was stimulated *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Content of Session 6

Meeting the objectives *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program met the identified objectives)

Relevant to my educational needs *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The content was relevant to my educational needs)

Program structure and organize *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The program was well-structured and organized)

No bias or conflict of interest *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Presentations has no bias or conflict of interest)

Meet your expectations *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(Quality of the activity met my expectations)

Outcome of Session 6

Knowledge of the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The understanding of the knowledge)

Competence *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(The ability to apply the knowledge)

Performance *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

(What is actually done in practice)

Speakers of Session 6

The content was up-to-date and evidence- based *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The material presented is relevant to my clinical practice *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker demonstrated expertise in the subject *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

The speaker has strong presentation and delivery style *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Audio-visuals were used effectively *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Interactive discussion was stimulated *

Rate 1 out of 5Rate 2 out of 5Rate 3 out of 5Rate 4 out of 5Rate 5 out of 5

Day Two Comment

Powered By: KAMA GROUP

1